1
September 2005 Edition 6
Volume 40
The Mane Event
of Lyons Jr Sr. High School
THIS IS YOUR MANE EVENT
The Editor’s Head
Editor in Chief, Brian Ocque
I do believe I have the prime
rib of political articles to write
about this month. I recently watched
a report on CNN about a Bush/Sol
dier press conference in Washing
ton D.C. It was a typical confer
ence about how things are running
in Iraq and how the President plans
to fix things up a bit. Everything
was fine and dandy, rather normal
actually, except for one startling
piece of video; one of the
President’s White House aides was
shown on tape rehearsing with the
soldiers what they are to say and
do while addressing the President.
A little startling to me, but is
it routine for them?
It was supposed to look like
a routine conference between the
soldiers in Iraq and the President
to the normal American eye, but
sources from
Good Morning America
state that there was a choreographed
session that took place instead.
White House Press Secretary Scott
McClellan suggested that choreog
raphy is needed in order to over
come technical difficulties when
doing a satellite feed. He went on
to say:
I think all they
were doing was talking to the
troops and letting them know
what to expect.
I would also expect this from
an analyst at the White House.
All in all, there may be some
sort of staging going on here. It
may be in order to restore the faith
that people have lost in this war
or to ensure some sort of security
in our President’s job. Either way,
I would hope that our beloved Presi
dent Bush would be able to tell
the truth when the moment of truth
came.
The point I’m making in the
first place is why are they lying
to us? Are they trying to glamor
ize the war, make people feel bet
ter about it? I think not, mainly
because recent polls suggest that
over half of the country does not
care for the way Bush is handling
this war. Whatever the reason is,
it won’t look pretty when it all
blows over.
Hurricane Katrina. It was seen originally as
a powerful hurricane coming off of the Gulf of Mexico.
It ended up being a huge disaster for one of the big
gest cities in the southern United States. Hurricane
Rita was a slightly less powerful hurricane that hit
moreorless the same place less than a month later.
Besides the hurricanes themselves, who is to blame
for the mass loss of lives all over the area.
First, I will put this out in the open: The United
States government is not to blame for the mass loss
of life due to the flooding of the New Orleans area. It
is to blame for the mass loss of life due to the after
effects of the New Orleans flood; however, I am get
ting ahead of myself. It was totally and fully the state
of Louisiana’s duty to evacuate the city before Katrina
hit. The fact that state government didn’t force the
residents to evacuate is the reason for the overall
problems the area suffered.
Let me explain this: The Louisiana state gov
ernment had a full 23 days to evacuate the city of
New Orleans. They didn’t even try. What is their
excuse? According to the governess, it was because
she didn’t think many people would leave. So what?
You are still obligated to try. Yet the state govern
ment did nothing. They didn’t even help people that
wanted to leave. The fact that they never prepared
an escape plan proves this.
Now, this may seem rather harsh, especially
to people expecting the full Bushbashing treatment,
but it is the truth. One example leads to the city’s
geography. It is so far under water (the whole city is
8 to 20 feet below sea level) that they have break
walls (levees) surrounding the city. Break walls, in
case you don’t know, keep flood waters from en
tering a city. They are basically watertight, ten feet
tall highway dividers. The ones surrounding New
Orleans were Category 3 break walls, meaning they
would survive a Category 3 hurricane and the re
sulting flood. It was a known fact among the engi
neers who built the break walls that
THEY
WOULD NOT LAST THROUGH A CAT
EGORY 5 HURRICAINE!
Katrina was a Cat
egory 5, and the walls didn’t last. They were not
designed to due so; therefore, they wouldn’t, and
they didn’t. In fact, the previously mentioned engi
neers asked for more state funding to make them
Category 5 break walls but were repeatedly de
nied the funding because politicians called it a
“Non
Issue”
. Since the state obviously didn’t care about
New Orleans, why did the state not force the city
to evacuate?
The Center of Disagreement
Logan “T” King
When you hear the word construction, nor
mally you think positively; a new change will occur,
one that would be more beneficial or better suited
for your living. Within our school a multitude of
changes has come about. The question to ask, how
ever, would be whether or not these new renova
tions affect our ability as students to learn; does it go
deeper than the surface?
What was supposed to be completed a while
ago is now an ongoing event. The construction, as
we all know, started towards the end of last year.
Major changes have come about and are great, but
why is it that when we are sitting within our class
room that we are interrupted by the sporadic sounds
of a drill or hammer echoing about the halls? We are
told that a school is a learning environment, and the
purpose of it is to educate the people within. The
thing, however, is that we cannot learn if we are un
able to concentrate on our work or hear what the
teacher is saying. It is important to me to be sur
rounded by a nice environment, and when it is done
it will be, but it is more important to receive a proper
education.
What I don’t get is how a disorderly and dis
ruptive student can be thrown out of class when they
are making less noise than many of the construction
workers themselves. The disorderly student may af
fect the one classroom that he/she is in, but that is
only one of many. The construction taking place dis
rupts plenty more. Shouldn’t rules apply to all? On
the other hand, though, I can honestly say that they
are only doing their jobs. If I may comment, their
doing a great job at that. Our hallways look much
better than previous years, and they must have had a
miracle when renovating the cafeteria. I am only try
ing to do my job as well, however, and learn what is
being taught to me. Now what we have to do is
decide whose interest will come first, the interest of
the student or that of a construction worker?
They are paid to make our school a better
place, to fix that which may be wrong. I used to
complain of how
“ghetto”
our school looked and
hoped that it would change. Now that it is starting
to change and looks halfway decent, I am still com
plaining. Even though the tiles make a big difference
and brighten up the halls, the carpet looks newer,
and the cafeteria for once actually looks like one,
the distraction of the noises don’t help what I actu
ally come to school to do.
I can be sitting in my eighth period class,
taking my test and rudely be interrupted by a noise
which sounds as if it is gnawing at the concrete be
neath me. I don’t know if it’s just me, but I can’t
seem to think of the correct answer to the question
that I just knew the answer to two seconds before
hand. I eventually will figure it out, but the point is
that my grade on it could be altered because of that.
Some people consider a grade just a grade,
but in reality it is far from just a grade. That one
grade is your life because if you allow yourself to fail
that one time, you will become that failure in life in
general as you will be come accustomed to failing. I
come to school to learn, no one HAS to, but I come
to be me, to succeed in something that I do. With all
this on going construction, how are we expected to
do our work?
Continued on page 4
Construction or
Disruption
LaChanda Mills, Sophomore
By the time you actually read
this article, the construction
should be done. The work
being done was annoying at
times, but hopefully we all
now agree it was worth it.
Our school looks GREAT!
Back to top