A | B | C | D | E | F | G | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Quality | 95 | 90 | 85 | 75 | 65 | 60 | |
2 | Meaning: the extent to which the response exhibits sound understanding, interpretation, and analysis of the task and source(s) | -establish a controlling idea that reveals an in-depth analysis of the source(s) | -establish a controlling idea that reveals a thorough understanding of the source(s) | -establish a controlling idea that shows a basic understanding of the source(s) | -establish a controlling idea that shows a basic understanding of the source(s) | -convey a confused or incomplete understanding of the source(s) | -provide minimal or no evidence of understanding of the source(s) | |
3 | -make insightful connections between the controlling idea and the ideas in the source(s) | -make clear and explicit connections between the controlling idea and the ideas in the source(s) | -make implicit connections between the controlling idea and the ideas in the source(s) | -make few or superficial connections between the controlling idea and the ideas in the source(s) | -make a few connections but fail to establish a controlling idea | -make no connections between the source(s) or among ideas in the source(s) | ||
4 | Development: the extent to which ideas are elaborated using specific and relevant evidence from the source(s) | -develop ideas clearly and fully, making effective use of a wide range of relevant and specific evidence and appropriate elements from the source(s) | -develop ideas clearly and consistently, with reference to relevant and specific evidence and appropriate elements from the source(s) | -develop some ideas more fully than others, with reference to specific and relevant evidence and appropriate elements from the source(s) | -develop ideas briefly, using some evidence from the source(s) -may rely primarily on summary | -are incomplete or largely undeveloped, hinting at ideas, but references to the source(s) are vague, irrelevant, repetitive, or unjustified | -are minimal, with no evidence of development | |
5 | Organization: the extent to which the response exhibits direction, shape, and coherence | -maintain the focus established by the controlling idea | -maintain the focus established by the controlling idea | -maintain a clear and appropriate focus | -establish, but fail to maintain, an appropriate focus | -lack an appropriate focus but suggest some organization, or suggest a focus but lack organization | -show no focus or organization | |
6 | -exhibit a logical and coherent structure through skillful use of appropriate devices and transitions | -exhibit a logical sequence of ideas through use of appropriate devices and transitions | -exhibit a logical sequence of ideas but may lack internal consistency | --exhibit a rudimentary structure but may include some inconsistencies or irrelevancies | ||||
7 | Language Use: the extent to which the response reveals an awareness of audience and purpose through effective use of words, sentence structure, and sentence variety | -are stylistically sophisticated, using language that is precise and engaging, with a notable sense of voice and awareness of audience and purpose | -use language that is fluent and original, with evident awareness of audience and purpose | -use appropriate language, with some awareness of audience and purpose | -rely on basic vocabulary, with little awareness of audience or purpose | -use language that is imprecise or unsuitable for the audience or purpose | -are minimal | |
8 | -vary structure and length of sentences to enhance meaning | -vary structure and length of sentences to control rhythm and pacing | -occasionally make effective use of sentence structure or length | -exhibit some attempt to vary sentence structure or length for effect, but with uneven success | -reveal little awareness of how to use sentences to achieve an effect | -use language that is incoherent or inappropriate | ||
9 | Conventions: the extent to which the response exhibits conventional spelling, punctuation, paragraphing, capitalization, grammar, and usage | -demonstrate control of the conventions with essentially no errors, even with sophisticated language | -demonstrate control of the conventions, exhibiting occasional errors only when using sophisticated language | -demonstrate partial control, exhibiting occasional errors that do not hinder comprehension | -demonstrate emerging control, exhibiting occasional errors that hinder comprehension | -demonstrate a lack of control, exhibiting frequent errors that make comprehension difficult | -are minimal, making assessment of conventions unreliable -may be illegible or not recognizable as English |