|
WAYNE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT |
DATE: April 7, 2004 | |
TIME: 6:30 p.m. | |
PLACE: High School Auditorium |
6:30 | Call to Order /Pledge of Allegiance | ||
6:30 | Executive Session | ||
7:30 | Approval of Agenda/Approval of MINUTES | ||
Att. 1 | |||
7:35 | Public Comment | ||
7:40 | Board Member Comments | ||
7:45 | Board President’s Comments | ||
7:50 | Action Item Report | ||
7:55 | Superintendent’s Report |
1. | Recognition Presentations | ||
2. | School Report Card | ||
3. | Performance Contract Decision | ||
4. | Budget Adoption | ||
Att. 2 | |||
5. | Student Questions |
8:30 | Items for Board Action: | |
1. Personnel Action Att. 3 | ||
2. CSE/CPSE Action Att. 4 | ||
3. Consensus Agenda: Att. 5 |
1. | Treasurer’s Report - February | |
2. | Approve Health Contract | |
3. | Approve Bid | |
4. | Approve Budget Transfer |
8:35 | Policy | ||
8:40 | Public Comment/Board Comments | |
8:45 | Adjournment | |
Next Meeting: Three Boards Meeting Walworth Town Hall | ||
District Mission Statement | |
Based on the belief that all students can learn, the staff of the Wayne Central School District accepts the responsibility to teach all students, regardless of differences, the fundamental skills. We further accept the responsibility to challenge all students to attain higher levels of achievement. Wayne Central will provide the opportunity, environment, and encouragement to meet this goal while developing the whole child, physically, socially, emotionally, and culturally. | |
WAYNE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ontario Center, New York 14520 | ||||||||||||||||||||
BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES | UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED | |||||||||||||||||||
DATE: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 | TIME: 7:30 p.m. | |||||||||||||||||||
TYPE: Regular Business Meeting | PLACE: High School Cafeteria | |||||||||||||||||||
PRESENT: Trustees Brunner, Diller, Griswold, Johnson, Lyke, Ratcliffe, Robusto, Triou, Wyse; District Clerk Switzer; Administrators Havens, Pirozzolo, Shaffer, Siracuse, Saxby, Woodard, Atseff, Spring, Callahan, Blankenberg, Davis | ||||||||||||||||||||
ABSENT: Trustee Ratcliffe | ||||||||||||||||||||
GUESTS: Visitor’s Roster filed in clerk’s agenda file, this meeting | ||||||||||||||||||||
I. | CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m. by Richard A. Johnson, School Board President | |||||||||||||||||||
Prior to the meeting, members of the Board of Education and school officials participated in a visit and tour of the co-generation and windmill power facility at Harbec Manufacturing Company at 369 Route 104 in Ontario to provide background knowledge for the presentation on energy performance contract during the business meeting. | ||||||||||||||||||||
II. | PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE | |||||||||||||||||||
III. | APPROVAL OF AGENDA & MINUTES (March 10, 2004) | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Johnson noted that the intent for an executive session would shift from prior to the business agenda to prior to adjournment at the end of the meeting. Mr. Wyse offered a MOTION to approve the agenda for this evening’s meeting, as revised, and the minutes of the meeting of March 10, 2004, as presented. 7 Ayes, 0 Nays, 1 Absent (Mr. Ratcliffe), 1 Abstention (Mr. Griswold), Carried. | ||||||||||||||||||||
A. | IV. | PUBLIC COMMENT – None |
V. | BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS |
A. | Mrs. Brunner stated that she attended the district-wide instrumental program, dubbed “bandomania,” as part of observance of Music In Our Schools Month and extended compliments to the student musicians and their instructors for the performances. |
B. | Mrs. Brunner stated that she attended the district-wide art show and exhibit and extended compliments to the students for their excellent work and to staff for efforts in presenting the event. |
C. | Mr. Robusto stated that he attended the recent donkey basketball game and complimented the students on their excellent behavior; the event was thoroughly enjoyed by everyone in attendance. |
D. | Mr. Wyse stated that he attended the district-wide vocal music program as part of observance of Music In Our Schools Month and extended compliments to the student musicians and their instructors for the performances. | |
VI. | BOARD PRESIDENT’S COMMENTS |
A. | Mr. Johnson extended thanks to Mr. Robert Bechtold, owner of Harbec Plastics Company, for hosting the visit by trustees and school officials prior to the business meeting this evening and for the background information he provided about windmill power. |
B. | Mr. Johnson welcomed students, parents, staff and others present for the Science Olympiad presentation scheduled for this evening’s business agenda. He added that the Board of Education is very proud of the achievement by local students. |
VII. | REPORT ON ACTION ITEMS BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS - None |
VIII. | REPORTS OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS |
PRESENTATION BY SCIENCE OLYMPIAD TEAM · MIDDLE SCHOOL |
Mr. Havens noted that students on Science Olympiad teams placed first and fifth in regional competition and continued a tradition of top performance in that event. He introduced Edward Currier, middle school science teacher/department chairperson, and Mrs. Paulette Bodak, parent volunteer, who served as coaches for the two teams, to introduce their team members. | |||||||||||||||||||
Each of the students narrated portions of a PowerPoint presentation on the varied topics and science concepts and skills included in the Olympiad competition (e.g erosion, weight, flight, sound, biology, physics, weight) The Endeavor team earned first place and the Discovery team earned fifth place, four (4) points behind the fourth place team. |
Mr. Havens and Mr. Currier presented certificates to the students, parent advisors, school advisors and other adults who assisted and supported the teams in their competition efforts ( copy of list of participants filed in clerk’s agenda file, this meeting). Again this year, T-shirts for team members were provided by the Walworth-Ontario Rotary Club. |
Parents, visitors and school officials present extended a hearty round of applause to the students on their achievements. On behalf of the students and others involved, Mr. Currier thanked everyone for their support and encouragement. | |||||||||||||||||||
During the recess, students hosted and explained displays of their varied competition events to persons present. |
Mr. Johnson extended thanks to parents of the students for their support that is essential for the success the children achieve. |
IX. | RECESS: | 8:00 p.m. | |||||||||||||||||
X. | RECONVENE: | 8:15 p.m. |
XI. | REPORTS OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS (continued) |
A. | PRESENTATION ON ENERGY PERFORMANCE CONTRACT PROPOSAL |
Mr. Havens introduced Mr. Robert Grant and Mr. Paul Darby from Atlantic Energy Services, Inc., to present information about an energy use audit of school facilities they conducted to determine potential economies in energy usage. They have also explored the used of co-generating mini-turbines and a windmill similar to that viewed and visited by the Board of Education prior to this evening’s meeting. | ||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Grant shared information about the scope and intent of energy performance contracts to obtain long-term energy and cost savings for public agencies (copy filed in clerk’s agenda file, this meeting). The projects are handled as capital projects by the NYS Education Department but do not require prior voter approval since the funding is derived from state building aid and re-allocation of savings achieved by the performance contract. Design plans and specifications require review and approval by the State Education Department. | ||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Grant stated that the preliminary evaluation of district facilities estimates annual savings of nearly $200,000 in energy costs. He also identified some upgrades to windows and boilers that would provide additional energy conservation and shared examples of projects conducted and economies realized by the several school districts with which his firm has worked on energy performance contracts. | ||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Havens asked what options are available to the school district if the energy savings projected by a performance contract do not occur. Mr. Grant stated that the “savings clause” included in the performance contract insures reimbursement to the school district. | ||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Robusto asked if the savings clause is guaranteed by the energy performance contractor or by a performance bond. Mr. Grant stated the guarantee is in the form of a performance bond. Mr. Darby stated that a copy of the guarantee is required by the NYS Education Department. | ||||||||||||||||||
Mrs. Lyke asked if the proposal included costs for a windmill and if windmills are in place in any other school districts. Mr. Grant stated he is exploring those costs and that no other districts have them in place. | ||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Havens asked how the size of a windmill for school use would compare to the one viewed this evening at Harbec Manufacturing Company. Mr. Grant stated that the size of a windmill to meet the energy needs of the facilities on the Ontario Center campus, (600 KW), is approximately twice the 250 KW now in place at the Harbec site. He added that the school campus would have a centralized energy generation site that would also generate savings in energy charges. | ||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Havens asked if some school districts have micro-generators in place; Mr. Grant noted some examples (e.g. Marion, Penfield Greece, Corning-Painted Post, Keshequa). | ||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Johnson asked about any limitations of local zoning regulations for installation of a windmill on school property. Mr. Grant noted that school districts are exempt from local zoning regulations; permits are issued by the NYS Education Department. Cooperative efforts with local communities are, however, incorporated into such plans. | ||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Havens noted that the proposal for wind-powered co-generation has many opportunities for instructional programs. Mr. Currier noted that the middle school presently has a photovoltaic system in place as part of the science program and noted the many links to math-science and technology classes that this proposal would have for local students. | ||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Wyse asked about the use of boilers and asked what percentage of the school district’s energy use the proposed project would cover; Mr. Grant stated appx. 95%. | ||||||||||||||||||
A student present in the audience asked if a windmill would have any impact on athletic fields. Mr. Grant stated that a proposed site was located on the perimeter of the Ontario Center campus southeast of the Ontario Primary School. | ||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Havens noted that the presentation this evening is for informational purposes and he will seek direction from the Board of Education on whether or not to pursue a comprehensive energy audit at the April meeting. | ||||||||||||||||||
Mrs. Lyke asked what time frame would occur subsequent to authorization for an energy performance audit by the Board of Education. Mr. Grant reviewed the necessary steps, extending over some six (6) months, for preparing specifications, seeking proposals, and obtaining state approvals. | ||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Havens asked what happens if an energy audit shows no advantages to the school district. Mr. Grant stated such a study is normally not pursued if potential energy savings are not projected; his preliminary audit of school facilities indicates a potential for such savings. | ||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Robusto asked if any web-based sources are available for further research on energy performance contracts. Mr. Grant provided details. | ||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Wyse suggested consideration as chillers to address existing concerns about cooling facilities and the possibility of incorporating it into the 2002 Capital Improvement Project. | ||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Griswold asked if the state aid for an energy performance contact is greater if it is linked to an instructional use. Mr. Havens provided details. | ||||||||||||||||||
Mrs. Lyke asked how long Mr. Grant’s firm has worked on energy performance contracts; Mr. Grant provided details. | ||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Havens will seek information from neighboring districts on their uses of co-generation facilities. Mr. Triou would like the opportunity to discuss those projects with officials at those school districts. | ||||||||||||||||||
Additional discussion followed and is generally summarized as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||
· Similar proposals in prior years were not pursued based on insufficient energy savings and absence of state aid or savings clauses in performance contracts that are now available | |||||||||||||||||
· Schools that have shifted to co-generation approaches have found them of value | |||||||||||||||||
· Project costs would equate to 65% from building aid and 35% from energy savings | |||||||||||||||||
· Consideration of additional maintenance and training costs is also necessary | |||||||||||||||||
· Heat generated by co-generation could be used | |||||||||||||||||
· Approval by the NYS Education Department is not granted if energy savings are not shown | |||||||||||||||||
· Additional information on the system in place at Harbec Manufacturing was requested | |||||||||||||||||
· In place of public approval, a resolution of the Board of Education is required to begin the energy performance contract process | |||||||||||||||||
· A windmill site should consider location of watershed retention ponds included in the 2002 Capital Improvement Project | |||||||||||||||||
· Compensation of the energy contractor is incorporated in overall project cost | |||||||||||||||||
· State regulations do not allow addition of air cooling facilities to a project if they are not already in place | |||||||||||||||||
· The firm selected to conduct the energy audit works closely with the school architect |
Mr. Johnson thanked Mr. Grant and Mr. Darby for their presentation and participation this evening and invited trustees to forward any additional questions they may have to Mr. Havens. |
UPDATE ON 2002 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT |
Mr. Havens asked Mr. Atseff to provide an update on state approval of the 2002 Capital Improvement Project. | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Atseff stated that the NYS Education Department has issued approval of architectural drawings and their approval of mechanical, electrical and plumbing specifications is expected soon. Following that review, state officials may pose additional questions or may issue final approvals. | |||||||||||||||||||
Upon receipt of state approval, final work on specifications is estimated at ten (10) days, followed by four to six weeks to advertise and obtain bids. At this date, award of bids is projected for late May or early June and work at the high school would begin in the summer of 2005. |
DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED 2004-2005 BUDGET |
Mr. Havens asked Mr. Atseff to provide information on final estimates of the projected 2004-2005-school budget. | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Atseff noted that the agenda enclosure reflects items discussed by the Board of Education through the March 10th meeting. This draft reflects a proposed budget-to-budget increase of 7.3% and a projected tax rate increase between 3.9% and 4.9%. About 1.7% of the budget increase is due to introduction of the full day kindergarten program and inclusion of modified football and volleyball and completion phase one of the model school’s program for 2004-2005. | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Havens noted that the projected tax rate increase is the lowest in the last five (5) years and that the school district is in the best financial position of the same time period while providing for the full day kindergarten program, modified football and volleyball and completion phase one of model schools for 2004-2005. | |||||||||||||||||||
Discussion followed on the present and future taxable assessed valuation of the nuclear power station and its impact on school finances. | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Griswold asked what tax rates area school districts are projecting for next year. Mr. Havens stated that projections presently range from 3% to 9%. | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Griswold asked if there are any items or areas the district might need which are not included. Mr. Havens stated that he does not favor incorporating additional items until revisions in the district’s taxable assessed value are finalized with the sale and assessment of the nuclear power station. He added that the local share of costs for full day kindergarten after the first year of transition aid and start of payments for the debt associated with the 2002 Capital Improvement Project are also factors to consider as part of budget planning for the 2005-2006 school year. | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Johnson noted that the proposed 2004-2005 budget represents the first time in five (5) years that the Board of Education has not had to agonize over revisions and reductions and it represents commitments made to issues such as full-day kindergarten, additional modified level athletic teams, and model school’s programs. He believes the community will support this proposed budget. |
Mr. Triou noted that the Board of Education is committed to communicating with the community on school issues and asked Mr. Havens what issues may have surfaced. Mr. Havens noted that the property re-valuation in local communities is the primary topic of discussion at this time. | |||||||||||||||||||
Mrs. Brunner asked if the allocation for refund of taxes is sufficient to meet any changes in assessed value after the school levy is determined. Mr. Havens and Mr. Atseff provided details. | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Triou asked when the project ed tax rate increase of 3.9% to 4.9% would be refined. Mr. Havens stated final data is expected when the proposed budget is presented to voters for consideration at the annual school election on May 18th. |
STUDENT QUESTIONS |
Crystal Loren, 2685 Ridge Road, Ontario, asked if and when the school district would open the fitness center at the high school for community use. Mr. Havens noted plans to allow community use of the fitness center by senior citizens, beginning April 1st, and in future joint programs through the town recreation and parks department. |
Tim Russell, 6874 Fisher Road, Ontario, asked what precautions were planned to prevent disruptions to the June exam schedule by the capital improvement project. Mr. Havens provided details. |
XII. | RECESS | 9:11 p.m. | ||||||||||||||||||
XIII. | RECONVNE | 9:15 p.m. | ||||||||||||||||||
XIV. ITEMS FOR BOARD OF EDUCATION ACTION | ||||||||||||||||||||
A. ADOPT SESSION DAY CALENDAR · 2004-2005 SCHOOL YEAR |
Mr. Havens presented the proposed session day calendar for the 2004-2005 school year for review and consideration by the Board of Education: |
Mrs. Brunner offered a MOTION to approve the proposed session day calendar for the 2004-2005 school year as recommended by the superintendent of schools. | |
Mr. Griswold asked about the number of half-day sessions planned for next year. Mr. Havens stated that half-days for staff training are now provided as full days every other month. | |
Mr. Triou noted that the proposed calendar includes 188 days and asked how many days neighboring districts have in their calendars. Mr. Havens stated that we have the greatest number of days. Mr. Wyse noted that the number of days is determined by the collective bargaining agreement with the teachers’ association. | |
Mrs. Diller asked what happens if all of the emergency days are not used. Mr. Havens stated any available days would be used for instructional purposes. | |
On the question, the vote was 8 Ayes, 0 Nays, 1 Absent (Mr. Ratcliffe), Carried. | |
B. | ADOPT RESOLUTION TO PARTICIPATE IN FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE | ||||||||||||||||||
(Shared Costs Re: Assessment Challenge of Nuclear Power Plant, Town of Ontario) |
Mr. Havens presented the proposed resolution to participate in shared costs for negotiation and litigation costs with the Town of Ontario & County of Wayne relative to challenge of real property tax assessments of the nuclear power station for review and consideration by the Board of Education. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mrs. Brunner offered a MOTION, seconded by Mr. Wyse, to adopt a RESOLUTION to participate in financial assistance in conjunction with the Town of Ontario & County of Wayne re: challenge of real property tax assessments, TO WIT: | ||||||||||||||||||||
RESOLVED, that the Wayne Central School District, in compliance and satisfaction with the County of Wayne Board of Supervisors Resolution 444-95, wherein the Board of Supervisors of the County of Wayne authorized the County of Wayne to participate in financial assistance for litigation challenges to real property assessments in excess of $200,000.00, agrees to share the cost of negotiations, litigation and legal fees equally with the County of Wayne provided the Town of Ontario, assessing taxes on properties within the Town of Ontario, agrees to share the cost of negotiations and litigation equally with the County of Wayne and the Wayne Central School District. | ||
On the question, the RESOLUTION was adopted by a vote of 8 Ayes, 0 Nays, 1 Absent (Mr. Ratcliffe). |
XV. | ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT - None |
VVI. ADDITIONAL BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS |
A. | Mr. Griswold noted the excellent information obtain during the visit and tour this evening at Harbec Manufacturing Company and suggestion written thanks from the Board of Education to Mr. Bechtold. |
B. | Mr. Robusto stated that the presentation on performance contracting was very informative and offers exciting opportunities for the school district. |
C. | Mr. Robusto commended Mr. Havens for his efforts to reach a conclusion on the nuclear power plant value issue as reflected by the resolution adopted this evening. |
D. | Mrs. Lyke shared information she received while seeking signatures on her trustee-nominating petition about home energy audits that are related to the tour, visit and presentation this evening. |
E. | Mr. Havens extended congratulations to Mr. Blankenberg, director of athletics and physical education, on his selection as Athletic Director of the Year by Section V. |
XVII. | EXECUTIVE SESSION (Personnel) | ||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Wyse offered a MOTION to adjourn the meeting,at 9:15 p.m., for an executive session on matters relating to specific personnel. 8 Ayes, 0 Nays, 1 Absent (Mr. Ratcliffe), Carried. | |||||||||||||||||||
XVIII. RECONVENE: | 9:56 p.m. | ||||||||||||||||||
XIX. | ADJOURNMENT | ||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Triou offered a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 9:57 p.m. 8 Ayes, 0 Nays, 1 Absent (Mr. Ratcliffe), Carried. | |||||||||||||||||||
Respectfully submitted, | |||||||||||||||||||
JAMES E. SWITZER | |||||||||||||||||||
School District Clerk | |||||||||||||||||||
APPROVAL OF MINUTES | |||||||||||||||||||
The foregoing minutes of the Board of | |||||||||||||||||||
Education were submitted for review | |||||||||||||||||||
& (approved as presented)(corrected | |||||||||||||||||||
as noted) at the meeting of | |||||||||||||||||||
April 7, 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||
--------------------------- | |||||||||||||||||||
School District Clerk | |||||||||||||||||||
JES/jes:wp | |||||||||||||||||||
Att. 2 | |
TO: | Michael Havens |
Superintendent of Schools | |
FROM: | Gregory Atseff |
Assistant Superintendent for Business | |
DATE: | April 10, 2004 |
RE: | 2004/2005 Budget |
Attached is the proposed 2004/2005 budget for board adoption. The proposed 2004/2005 budget includes the following additions to the instructional program. | |
1. | Full Day Kindergarten | |
2. | Modified Football | |
3. | Model Schools – completion of Phase I | |
4. | Modified Volleyball |
The estimated tax rate increase for the 2004/2005 budget is 3.9% |
TEACHING - REGULAR SCHOOL |
Error! Not a valid link. Error! Not a valid link. |
Budget Code | Object of Expense | FTE
|
HS
|
MS
|
OE
|
OP
|
FW
|
District
|
Total
|
A2110.100 | Early Start Salaries | 0
|
.120 | K-2 Salaries | 26.8
|
1,245,300
|
1,245,300
|
.120 | K-5 Salaries | 29.0
|
1,411,900
|
1,411,900
|
.120-07 | K-Full Day | 4.0
|
140,000
|
20,000
|
160,000
|
.120-07 | K-6 Salaries/PCEN | 1.0
|
44,535
|
44,535
|
.120-07 | Enrichment Coord. | 1.0
|
46,320
|
46,320
|
.120 | 3-5 Salaries | 25.0
|
1,251,820
|
1,251,820
|
.120 | 6-Salaries | 9.0
|
439,500
|
439,500
|
.130 | 7-8 Salaries | 38.8
|
1,752,700
|
1,752,700
|
.130-07 | Teacher Mentor | 35,000
|
35,000
|
.130 | 9-12 Salaries | 54.0
|
2,596,200
|
2,596,200
|
.168 | Tchr. Aides/Ass’t Salaries | 33.0
|
90,300
|
65,000
|
130,000
|
104,000
|
160,000
|
31,000
|
580,300
|
.168-07 | Tchr. Aides/ K-Full Day | 3.0
|
30,000
|
15,000
|
45,000
|
.200 | Equipment | 3,165
|
4,225
|
8,925
|
3,600
|
1,850
|
1,300
|
23,065
|
.200 | Equipment (K-Full Day) | 30,000
|
15,000
|
45,000
|
.400 | Contractual Expenses | 21,725
|
4,720
|
950
|
860
|
2,575
|
23,925
|
54,755
|
.401 | Mileage/Conferece
|
6,070
|
5,350
|
0
|
3,600
|
4,000
|
1,825
|
20,845
|
.480 | Textbooks | 43,515
|
42,740
|
22,695
|
21,720
|
23,380
|
154,050
|
.500 | Supplies | 52,520
|
47,600
|
17,850
|
22,290
|
23,475
|
15,430
|
179,165
|
.500 | Supplies (K-Full Day) | 20,000
|
10,000
|
30,000
|
Budget Code |
Object of Expense |
Art |
Enrichment |
Music |
P/E |
PCEN |
Bi-Lingual
|
Reading Buddies
|
District |
Total |
.120-07 | Salaries | 46,320
|
46,320
|
.200-07 | Equipment | 300
|
0
|
0
|
1,000
|
0
|
0
|
1,300
|
.400-07 | Contractual Expenses | 75
|
6,580
|
1,970
|
1,000
|
0
|
0
|
14,300
|
23,925
|
.401-07 | Mileage/Conferences | 825
|
0
|
500
|
500
|
0
|
0
|
1,825
|
.500 | Supplies | 1,300
|
10,600
|
30
|
0
|
3,300
|
200
|
15,430
|
Last Name
|
First Name
|
Benwell | David |
Brol | Bonnie |
Cheetham | Lisa |
Connelly | Craig |
Deverell | Lee |
Herden | Mark |
Kent | Amanda |
Lambert | Courtney |
Martin | Scott |
Munding | Kimberly |
Sandefer | Corrie |
Schlegel | Lisa |
Sollame | Becky |
Stead | Janis |
Vendor
|
Bid Total
|
Discount
|
|
1.
|
Corr Distributors, Inc..
33 Chandler Street Buffalo, NY 14207 |
$3,139.57
|
|
2.
|
Economy Paper
1174 E. Main Street PO Box 90420 Rochester, NY 14609 |
6,108.75
|
1%
|
3.
|
Gabriel First Corp.
233 West Commercial St. East Rochester, NY 14445 |
10,780.29
|
|
4.
|
Hillyard Chemical Co
159 Lagrange Ave. Rochester, NY 14613-1511 |
2,527.84
|
15%
|
5.
|
L.J.C. Distributors
1626 Cedar Ave. Scranton, PA 18505 |
1,800.00
|
|
6.
|
Palmer Distributing
100 Hoffman St. Newark, NY 14513 |
974.52
|
State Cont.
|
Total
|
$25,330.97
|