1. | Executive Session - There will be an executive session to discuss personnel matters including tenure recommendations. |
2. | Action Item Report – I do not believe I have anything pending to report at this meeting. Please let me know if there is something I may have overlooked. |
3. | Freewill in the News- Freewill was on the news last Thursday as a result of a project they are doing. We will take a few moments to view a tape of the news cast. |
4. | Reading Recovery Program - Staff from Ontario Primary will be presenting an update on the Reading Recovery Program and its progress. Mr. LaRuche will also be participating. |
5. | Graduation Ceremonies – I thought we might want to take a moment and discuss the Board’s role and attendance at the Wayne Central Commencement Exercises on June 21st at 8:00 p.m. at the Finger Lakes Performing Arts Center. I hope that you will all be able to participate. It is one of the highlights of the Board Member’s unappreciated and lonely jobs. |
6. | Coca-Cola Contract Update - I will provide an update on the Coca-Cola contract revisions and timelines. |
7. | Building Project Propositions –I have listed the three proposals and some positive and negatives from each below: |
PROPOSALS | PRO | CON |
Proposal #1 – Proposition including all agreed upon items | ·
Simple and easy to understand
· Other project components might carry pool |
You may increase the risk of losing components you can’t afford to lose.
· In deciding about a pool it was said we should “let the public decide on the pool.” This does not appear to allow that. · The pool appears to have already generated the most controversy. |
Proposal #2 –
Proposition 1: Must do and should do Proposition 2: Pool |
·
Allows community to make decision about pool on its own
· May allow the science wing supporters to work together. · Gives greater credibility that the “should bes” are important · Avoids complicated explanation of why somethings are “should do” and others are “must do” |
· Pool may not be as likely to pass |
Proposal #3 –
Proposition 1: “Must do” Proposition 2: “Should do” Proposition 3: “pool” |
·
Gives people greater choice
· May increase likelihood that “must do” get passed |
May be confusing to explain why something is a “should do” or a “must do.” One person’s “should do” may be another’s “must do.”
· “Should do” may be interpreted as frivolous. · Appears to give them something to vote no on. |