|
Name of Group: District Improvement Team | Objective: To improve student academic achievement, communications and culture. |
Date: 7-26-06 |
Agenda Items
|
Discussion
|
Action Required
|
Responsibility (Who)
|
Completion
Date |
1. Meeting began at 6:05 p.m. | Susan Salvaggio – Facilitator, Penny Shockley Hyland -Time Keeper | |||
2. Disaggregated Data – Primary School | Benchmark students took a big leap, classified stayed constant, no 504 students
|
Need to target explicit instruction.
Work on template for school improvement teams to use. |
Julie Gelina | |
3. Disaggregated Data – Intermediate School | Has met the goals targeted for Science 4 and Social Studies 5. They have not yet received the results for ELA and Math. All subgroups made increases in Social Studies. | Al Autovino | ||
4. Disaggregated Data – Middle School | Waiting for results for ELA and Math. Living Environment did not meet their goal of 92% for level 3 and 4 students; however it did increase 5% to 78%. The percentage of scoring at level 4 rose 4% to 17%. | Areas to address include discrepancies in data for classified students; discrepancy between males and females (e.g. Spanish 7 – 42% of males scored at levels 1 and 2 compared to 17% of females.) | Nelson Kise | |
5. Disaggregated Data – High School | Met goal in English. Comparisons of Regents exams in all topics have progressed even thought targets were not met.
Improvement plans are in place for Global Studies and Earth Science. Disaggregated Data summary is attached. |
Curriculum document is being written this summer for Social Studies (scope and sequence document that lays out what will be taught in 9th and 10th grade). | Tim Reynolds | |
6. Comparison to other Wayne County Schools | The information provided was based on the 2005 NYS Report Card | Susan Salvaggio | ||
7. Set Agenda for Next Meeting | ·
Terra Nova Results – Disaggregated
· Report from Strategic Visioning (Aug 2 & 3) · Schedules/balance at grade level · PBIS Report Deb Brown - Facilitator, Rita Lesniak - Timekeeper for 9/11/06 |
Facilities Request for 2006-07 meetings in HS Library.
|
Regina Moline | 8/1/06 |
Members Present: Lynda Faulks, Priscilla Lawrence, Rita Lesniak, Susan Salvaggio, Penny Shockley, Elizabeth Terry, Jeff Tuma, Donald Woodard, Representatives: Julie Gelina – PS, Al Autovino – IS, Nelson Kise – MS, Tim Reynolds – HS; Advisory: none
Members Absent: Julie Beckens, Kathy Bliek, Deb Brown, Stephen Humbert, Roy Hyland, Tim Padden, John Robbins |
Total # Students | # SWD | # Black | # White | # Low SES |
32
|
1
|
3
|
29
|
5
|
3 %
|
9 %
|
91 %
|
16 %
|
Total # Students | # SWD | # Black | # White | # Low SES |
46
|
0
|
1
|
43
|
10
|
0 %
|
2 %
|
93 %
|
22 %
|
Total # Students | # SWD | # Black | # White | # Low SES |
19
|
0
|
1
|
18
|
2
|
0 %
|
5 %
|
95 %
|
11 %
|
Total # Students | # SWD | # Black | # White | # Low SES |
14
|
0
|
0
|
14
|
1
|
0 %
|
0 %
|
100 %
|
7 %
|
Total # Students | # SWD | # Black | # White | # Low SES |
66
|
1
|
6
|
59
|
12
|
2 %
|
9 %
|
92 %
|
18 %
|
Total # Students | # SWD | # Black | # White | # Low SES |
102
|
13
|
14
|
86
|
27
|
89% scoring 3,4
|
9=69 %
|
9=64 %
|
80=93 %
|
21=78 %
|
Total # Students | # SWD | # Black | # White | # Low SES |
78
|
10
|
12
|
62
|
29
|
74% scoring 3,4
|
4=40 % (3s)
|
10=83 %
|
46=74 %
|
18=62 %
|
Total # Students | # SWD | # Black | # White | # Low SES |
41
|
0
|
3
|
37
|
4
|
61% scored 3,4
|
0=0 %
|
1=33 %
|
24=65 %
|
3=75 %
|
Total # Students | # SWD | # Black | # White | # Low SES |
134
|
10
|
15
|
113
|
44
|
78% scoring 3,4
|
5=50 %
|
8=53 %(3s)
|
93=82 %
|
30=68 %
|
Total # Students | # SWD | # Black | # White | # Low SES |
66
|
1
|
6
|
59
|
12
|
91% scoring 3,4
|
1=100 %
|
5=83 %
|
54=92 %
|
11=92 %
|
Total # Students | # SWD | # Black | # White | # Low SES |
128
|
14
|
14
|
108
|
42
|
63% scoring 3,4
|
4=29 %
|
2=14 %
|
77=71 %
|
20=48 %
|
Total # Students | # SWD | # Black | # White | # Low SES |
128
|
18
|
15
|
109
|
40
|
64% scoring 3,4
|
5=28 %
|
2=13 %
|
78=72 %
|
19=48 %
|
Total # Students | # SWD | # Black | # White | # Low SES |
107
|
13
|
12
|
90
|
32
|
82% scoring 3,4
|
8=62 %
|
9=75 %
|
76=84 %
|
21=66 %
|