1. EduTech Steering Committee
    1. Joe Backer, Letchworth     Joe Marinelli, W-FL BOCES
    2. Richard Boyes, Marion     Jack McCabe, W-FL BOCES
    3. Gary Hammond, GV BOCES    
    4. Robert Smith, Elba
    5. The presentation continued on the budget -
      1. Total Budget     $10,148,034
      2. Percentage of Change   +2.7%
    6. Factors driving the budget –
      1. Revenue Sources
      2. District Pricing -
        1. Questions, comments, or follow up items for December 12 meeting –
    7. Fringe Benefits from 02-03 actual to 03-04 current appropriation appear to be inconsistent
    8. Provide budgeted and actuals for multiple years


EduTech Steering Committee
Novenber 14, 2003
RIT Inn and Conference Center
 
Members Present:


Joe Backer, Letchworth     Joe Marinelli, W-FL BOCES



Joe Backer, Letchworth        Joe Marinelli, W-FL BOCES


Richard Boyes, Marion     Jack McCabe, W-FL BOCES



Richard Boyes, Marion        Jack McCabe, W-FL BOCES


Gary Hammond, GV BOCES    



Gary Hammond, GV BOCES      
Robert Leiby, Manchester-Shortsville    Camille Sorenson, EduTech
Tom Manko, York  
Tim McElheran, Victor
Mike Glover, GV BOCES        
 
Members Absent:
Daniel Starr, North Rose-Wolcott


Robert Smith, Elba



Robert Smith, Elba
Guests:
Chris Saxby, EduTech
 
Budget
 
Camille opened the budget presentation with a recap of EduTech service management statistics on Help Desk activity, SAA dollar activity, SAA Service Delivery Statistics.
 
Action Item: Camille to provide Help Desk statistics by District, by category.
 


The presentation continued on the budget -



The presentation continued on the budget -
 


Total Budget     $10,148,034



Total Budget         $10,148,034
    Change for Current Budget   +$263,219


Percentage of Change   +2.7%



Percentage of Change     +2.7%
 


Factors driving the budget –



Factors driving the budget –
Increase areas--
+ 4 % Salary
+11% ERS, 4.5% TRS
+16% Medical, 4% Dental
+ 4% Workers Comp
 
Decrease areas -
- 14.9 % Equipment, - 2.6% Supplies
- 9.4% Travel, - 2.9% Other Expenses
 
Budget areas -
Equipment- includes replacement equipment (for
staff and infrastructure), contingency
equipment, R & D
 
Supplies - includes forms for Schoolmaster, SASI,
Finance, staff supplies
Travel - includes mileage for staff, training travel
 
Training - includes technical, application (Student,
Finance, Test Scoring ) training
 
 
Other Expenses - includes
 Hardware and Software Maintenance, Communications Line Charges,
 Consultants,
 Payments to Other BOCES (i.e. Part 200, Test Scoring),
 Contingency Expenditures
 


Revenue Sources



Revenue Sources
·   Annual Service Fees (Required Service Delivery Standards, Buy-In Services [i.e. Finance, Student])
·   One-Time Service Fees (Install income, extra reports)
·   Grants
·   Cross Contracts (Project Accelerate, Student, Finance)
 
Budget Summary
·   +2.7% Increase over last year’s budget
·   Budget increases in salary, health care, retirement
·   Budget decreases in equipment, supplies, travel
 


District Pricing -



District Pricing -
·   Increase all EduTech services by +7%
 


Questions, comments, or follow up items for December 12 meeting –



Questions, comments, or follow up items for December 12 meeting –
 


Fringe Benefits from 02-03 actual to 03-04 current appropriation appear to be inconsistent



Fringe Benefits from 02-03 actual to 03-04 current appropriation appear to be inconsistent
 


Provide budgeted and actuals for multiple years



Provide budgeted and actuals for multiple years
 
Mid year to date expenditures would be helpful
 
Pricing increase options / with impact to miscellaneous revenue would be helpful
 
Why is the district pricing increase x% across the board ?
 Answer, because the expenditure increases were in all service areas (health care, retirement, salary)
 
Why did we move away from the cost center approach ?
Answer, we did not move away from the cost center approach, matching expenditures to revenues with the help of a cost accountant is a process we use every few years
 
A caution, we will adjust pricing based on regional financial need, however further reductions will degrade service level delivery
 
Perhaps pricing should be by service level desired i.e. 4 hours response is a different fee than 24 hour response
 
Base costs on 1/1 services, cost can go up when additional services are purchased but not down, if services are cut
 
 
·   Next meeting
March 12 at Rochester Inn and Conference Center
 

 

Back to top